Mission Statement
Staff and Board
Speakers Bureau
Policy Papers
In the Media
Links
What's New
Contact Us
Home Page
Enter your eMail below to join our mailing list.
Enter Your eMail:

-Remove me!
 



Reserving the Right to Object
Want To Eliminate Property Taxes? Why Not Let Taxpayers Decide?
By David A. Atkinson

For fifty years, serious proposals to reform, reduce, or eliminate property taxes have been paraded through the state Capitol. Variant in approach and details, these plans have one thing in common: None has come into being. This frustrating experience reinforces a hard truth - it is nearly impossible to make politics and finances square up in a specific plan.

Hating property taxes is easy. Devising a fiscally responsible and politically substitute is devilishly difficult. Complicating the debate is the bloc of taxpayers who want property taxes eliminated but not replaced. Great populist politics perhaps, but capsizing public education is not the path to a more prosperous Pennsylvania.

Next to property taxes, which one do taxpayers dislike most? The tax picked to replace the billions of dollars of property taxes now levied. The fundamental problem - erasing property taxes does not reduce the overall tax burden, but merely shifts it around, and might not even spread it around. The spending driving up taxes will continue to generate controversy and taxpayer unhappiness, even if property taxes are relegated to the museum of revenue generators.

Rising populism and new faces in the General Assembly arguably could result in landmark legislation passing this session. But since the lieutenant governor broke a Senate tie vote in the negative last session, a signature by Governor Wolf is far from assured. Especially since state taxes used to replace property taxes are no longer available to fill in state budget deficits.

Instead of running up the middle again, why not try some razzle-dazzle? This is not meant to devalue the current elimination proposal, which has undergone more than a decade of development, refinement, and assertive advocacy. Rather, it reflects the hazardous political minefield even the most thoughtful and well-constructed plan must traipse through.

The seeds for an alternative are found in two efforts attacking the property tax problem a generation ago. In 1989, the Casey tax plan effectively appeared on the primary ballot because it was tied to a proposed constitutional amendment for a homestead exemption. In January, passage looked sure-fire. In May, it was voted down by more than 3-1. Several missteps in constructing and selling the plan doomed it. But there remains value in letting the taxpayers make the choice based on specifics, rather than the "trust us" pitch.

In Michigan, legislation set a drop dead date for property taxes. The first replacement plan went down the tubes. So officials then had Michigan voters choose between two plans. Property taxes were back in the mix, but greatly reduced.

Why not combine the best aspects from these two efforts in a new Pennsylvania approach? Submit three options to voters in a referendum.

Option number one is a comprehensive plan for eliminating property taxes as a means of paying for education.

Option number two is a major reduction in property taxes.

Option number three is essentially the default mechanism, keeping the status quo, for those fearing the unknown tax consequences and those who congenitally mistrust anything crafted in Harrisburg.

In this way, plans can be constructed according to what will work functionally, rather than what it takes to secure legislative votes or a governor's signature or to get around the obstacles posed by traditional opponents. There is no shortage of pieces and parts from fifty years of plans that can be used to assemble options one and two.

For example, in the elimination plan, the concern about tax breaks for commercial properties can be addressed. In the reduction plan, caps or referenda can be used to address concerns about property taxes rising again. The sales pitch then focuses on calculated impact rather than conjectured intentions.

Property tax plans are invariably accused of falling short of generating sufficient replacement revenue. When true, that is a serious defect. The cure in this case would be to have several independent analysts certify that options one and two do not contain a deficit, before they are debated and placed on the ballot.

The plans for eliminating or reducing property taxes will be complicated critters. So individuals and interest groups need ample time to chew them over and do their calculations about what change means for them and their communities. The Casey plan was picked apart in four months. Because this method requires some comparison shopping between competing options, there should be at least a six-month interval between the public presentation of the plans and the vote.

When to time a vote? Candidates for public office running in primaries and general elections will be legitimately worried about getting their elections tangled with this intensely emotional subject. So do it as a special statewide election. Pick a time, say September, when there are fewer potential hurdles to voter turnout.

This approach is certainly more intriguing than merely convening another special session of the legislature, which tends to let out steam rather than build pressure and momentum.

The conventional wisdom has taken a pounding in recent years, as taxpayer demands for change grow more insistent. At the same time, the raging arguments over Obamacare, and the exclusionary, borderline imperial manner in which it was developed, approved, and implemented, further eroded confidence in government generated solutions on consequential pocketbook matters.

So why not pull the people into the decisionmaking on the Holy Grail of Pennsylvania politics - a long-sought remedy for rampaging dislike of property taxes?

David A. Atkinson is an Associate with The Susquehanna Valley Center.

Nothing contained here should be considered as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any legislation before the General Assembly.

The views expressed here are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Susquehanna Valley Center.


Want To Eliminate Property Taxes? Why Not Let Taxpayers Decide?
By David A. Atkinson
The Public Interest Loses Again: A Discouraging Case Study In Subverting Open Government And Sanctioning Secrecy
By David A. Atkinson
BIENNIAL BUDGETING IS BIPARTISAN SOLUTION TO ANNUAL IMPASSES
May 23, 2016 - By Lt. Governor Mike Stack and State Senator Ryan Aument
Judges and Political Campaigns Do Not Mix Well
May 13, 2016 By David Atkinson, Associate, Susquehanna Valley Center
Merit Selection Of Judges: A Better Method For Attaining Quality Courts
By David A. Atkinson
Remembering Scalia
February 18, 2016 - By James R. Copland
Pennsylvania Should Hit the Brakes as the Supreme Court Stays EPA's Clean Power Plan
February 15, 2016 - By John Pippy, Pennsylvania Coal Alliance
COLWYN, PENNSYLVANIA: THE TOWN THAT CAN'T SEEM TO GOVERN ITSELF
By Daniel C. Vock
Going the Distance for Business Competitiveness
January 8, 2016 - By David N. Taylor
CLIMATE DATA SHENANIGANS FROM WOLF AND OBAMA
December 4, 2015 - Provided by The Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Association
Pennsylvania Wrongly Endorses Carbon Rules: Other States Prepare Legal Action
August 13, 2015 - By The Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Association
National Civil War Museum: An Asset To Be Appreciated
August 10, 2015 - By David A. Atkinson
To Create Better Jobs and Schools Governor Wolf Needs a Robust Healthcare Industry
July 13, 2015 - By Andy Carter
The EPA's "Clean Power Plan" Will Have Far Reaching Negative Impacts on the Economy and Middle Class
June 24, 2015 - By Charles E. Greenawalt, Ph.D., Senior Fellow
Stop The EPA's War Against The Poor
June 19, 2015 - By Dr. Shawn Ritenour, Ph.D.
New Energy Taxes Will Cost Pennsylvania Jobs
June 18, 2015 - By Earl Baker
How Come Our Cash-Strapped Universities in the US and England Can Afford So Many Administrators?
June 10, 2015 - By Melanie McDonagh
Closed Primaries Give Voters Clearer Choices in Elections
June 2, 2015 - By Ann Womble
We Must Save The Syrian City of Palmyra Or The Maniacs Will Raze Civilisation
May 22, 2015 - By Boris Johnson
Yes, Pennsylvania There is a Pension Crisis - Now What Are We Going to Do About It?
May 20, 2015 - By Charlie Gerow
Another Look at Downsizing the State Legislature
April 22, 2015 - By Charles E. Greenawalt II, Ph.D., Senior Fellow
What Would Nixon Do?
April 16, 2015 - By Ben Stein
Say Thanks to Your Township Supervisor!
April 7, 2015 - By David M. Sanko
The Knights Templar Shows How to Fight ISIS and Win
March 26, 2015 - By Andrew L. Peek
Should Congress Pass the 'Authorization to Use Military Force' as Proposed by President Obama?
March 1, 2015 - By Charles E. Greenawalt, Ph.D., Senior Fellow
Pipelines Will Help Lead to America's Energy Independence
January 21, 2015 - By Richard Filling
Municipal Pensions: The Rest of the (Untold) Story
January 16, 2015 - By David M. Sanko
New Report Shows PA Hospitals Are Saving More Lives Than Ever
December 18, 2014 - By Hospital and Healthsystem Association of PA
New Poll Finds Pennsylvanians Concerned About Proposed EPA Power Plant Regulations
October 22, 2014 - By Partnership for a Better Energy Future
Obama is Risking A U.S. Ebola Outbreak For His Own Ambitions
October 17, 2014 - By Liz Peek, The Fiscal Times
Page 1 of 18